foreign key. But there is no relation defined to what table this
foreign key refers [I think you mean that you have no REFERENCES
clause?]. I suppose the link [sic: reference] between these two tables
is purely managed programmatically. <<
I worked for a company that wrote crap like that when I first moved to
Austin. They are still in business, but down from ~1200 employees to
~200 and are now outsourcing their Indian operations to China as they
shrink.
This kind of thing falls apart in about a year. You get orphans all
over the schema (we choked a hard disk for a relatively small custom
sales commission package). There is no ways to validate or verify a
GUID; you need a proper key instead of a bad attempt at pointer
chains. The "pseudo Foreign Key" will be referenced by Cabbages and
Kings simply because all GUIDs can be compared (like pointers or other
exposed physical locators).
You really need to throw this thing out. But if you cannot, then
update your resume.--CELKO-- wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>>In one table there is GUID as a primary key and another GUID as
foreign key. But there is no relation defined to what table this
foreign key refers [I think you mean that you have no REFERENCES
clause?]. I suppose the link [sic: reference] between these two tables
is purely managed programmatically. <<
>
I worked for a company that wrote crap like that when I first moved to
Austin. They are still in business, but down from ~1200 employees to
~200 and are now outsourcing their Indian operations to China as they
shrink.
>
This kind of thing falls apart in about a year. You get orphans all
over the schema (we choked a hard disk for a relatively small custom
sales commission package). There is no ways to validate or verify a
GUID; you need a proper key instead of a bad attempt at pointer
chains. The "pseudo Foreign Key" will be referenced by Cabbages and
Kings simply because all GUIDs can be compared (like pointers or other
exposed physical locators).
He can add REFERENCES clauses (once he figures out which ones should
be added, and cleans up any existing exceptions), surely?|||>He can add REFERENCES clauses (once he figures out which ones should be added, and cleans up any existing exceptions), surely? <<
Then he will have mimicked a 1970's pointer chain DB in SQL instead of
making this a properly designed RDBMS.
For example, if I use an VIN for an automobile, I can verify the VIN
by going to the automobile, the DMV, insurance company, etc. But if I
use a GUID (or any other hardware generated value), I have no trusted
external source for verification.
I do not have a good way to validate it, in fact. The magical
universal GUID might be used for an automobile, a squid or Britney
Spears!
No comments:
Post a Comment